Рекламирайте тук Затвори
Реклама в секции форуми и базар

Под формата на платени обяви можете да рекламирате ваши продукти, услуги или други комерсиални дейности. Обявата може да бъде публикувана избирателно във форум по ваше желание или във всички форуми на сайта.

За стандартната ценова листа и условия изпратете
запитване до webmaster@photo-forum.net.
Платени обяви
Как да рекламирам?
        
Всички теми
Към тема
 Теми - forum: Архив
 първа  назад  1  2  3     всички  напред  последна
 connections (бръщолевеници)
Автор: joshua   
Дата:   24-01-05 22:12

Man Ray aka ....

https://photo-forum.net/static/forum/2006-01/mhlf9205.JPG
http://www.manray-photo.com/catalog/images/interfaces/fr/regard.jpg


Self-Portrait Assemblage:
https://photo-forum.net/static/forum/2006-01/uksd8107.JPG
http://www.getty.edu/art/collections/images/l/06125201.jpg

Отговори на това съобщение
 Re: connections (бръщолевеници)
Автор: SanniE   
Дата:   24-01-05 22:25





Публикацията е редактирана (25-01-05 00:09)

Отговори на това съобщение
 Re: connections (бръщолевеници)
Автор: joshua   
Дата:   24-01-05 22:27

We'll Always Have Paris

Before World War II, before the "New York School" made abstract paintings like blackboards, art had the "School of Paris." Before de Kooning's woman displayed her crotch, Soutine painted female faces like pudenda.

3 entries found for pudenda.
pu·den·dum ( P ) Pronunciation Key (py-dndm)
n. pl. pu·den·da (-d)
The human external genital organs, especially of a woman. Often used in the plural.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Latin, neuter gerundive of pudre, to make or be ashamed.]

http://www.haberarts.com/soutine.htm#manray

tears:
http://www.walkerart.org/programs/vaexhib_images/tears.jpg


Anxiety:
https://photo-forum.net/static/forum/2021-11/dlph1944.jpg
http://www.getty.edu/art/collections/images/l/06123701.jpg

Отговори на това съобщение
 Re: connections (бръщолевеници)
Автор: joshua   
Дата:   24-01-05 22:28

невежеството имало очарование???

Отговори на това съобщение
 Re: connections (бръщолевеници)
Автор: murnau   
Дата:   24-01-05 22:31

hahahaha,
male male, sannie.........

Отговори на това съобщение
 Re: connections (бръщолевеници)
Автор: niagara   
Дата:   24-01-05 22:34

[smile] [smilie18] [smilie18] [smilie5]

Отговори на това съобщение
 Re: connections (бръщолевеници)
Автор: se7en   
Дата:   24-01-05 22:44

"For me there's no difference between dream and reality. I never know if what I'm doing is done when I'm dreaming or when I'm awake."

"Dreams have no titles."

[smilie24]

Отговори на това съобщение
 Re: connections (бръщолевеници)
Автор: joshua   
Дата:   24-01-05 22:52

Painting with light
The legacy of Man Ray's photograms

by Brian Lindamood

Man Ray didn't invent the photogram. Some of the earliest experimenters in photography, beginning in the 1840s, created images by placing objects directly on light-sensitive paper. But the American artist in Paris rejuvenated the photogram, giving the medium life as a fine art as part of the 1920s avant garde--a life that continues to evolve at the hands of artists today.

Shadows and Light: Man Ray and His Legacy, an exhibition at the Columbus Museum of Art through January 10, makes this connection between the old and new, from the artform Ray awakened in 1922 to the work of contemporary artists who continue to push the boundaries of the photogram. Said Catherine Evans, CMA curator of photography, "Man Ray put the photogram back in the vocabulary of photographers and artists."

http://www.columbusalive.com/1998/19981029/art.html

ps
а, sannie, ако ше махаме с опашка пред батковците, не е зле първо да пита ме батко g google



Публикацията е редактирана (24-01-05 22:55)

Отговори на това съобщение
 Re: connections (бръщолевеници)
Автор: papi   
Дата:   24-01-05 23:04

на кой какво му е в главата(sannie)...този форум заприличва май на място където хора се изхождат...

Отговори на това съобщение
 Re: connections (бръщолевеници)
Автор: fogas   
Дата:   24-01-05 23:13

Що бе Папи, аз с удоволствие следя свалките на Джошуа със stranger, ама тя се покри нещо и на него му е мъчно и тъжи по този начин (с теми като тази). [smilie5]

Отговори на това съобщение
 Re: connections (бръщолевеници)
Автор: joshua   
Дата:   24-01-05 23:20

As an American in prewar Europe, could Man Ray stand for both Modernisms? At least he had the versatility to pull off all sorts of tricks. He worked in oils, drawing, and photography. He tried assemblage before it had a name, and he lent his name to solarized prints, the "Rayograms." In these he exposed film in direct contact with the object to be recorded.

His verbal facility holds all that experimentation together. One recognizes right away his mix of poetry and humor, like a joke too dazzling to spoil by laughter. It gives his assemblages the bite of Dada and the allusiveness of Surrealism. It echos in the titles of his paintings, like The Rope Dancer Accompanying Herself with Her Shadow.


fogas, въпрос ли зададе некъф?

Отговори на това съобщение
 Re: connections (бръщолевеници)
Автор: SanniE   
Дата:   24-01-05 23:39





Публикацията е редактирана (25-01-05 00:10)

Отговори на това съобщение
 Re: connections (бръщолевеници)
Автор: joshua   
Дата:   24-01-05 23:48

ех, и твоята не е лесна.......

ps
https://photo-forum.net/static/forum/2006-01/nqdf9297.JPG
http://www.manray-photo.com/catalog/images/photos/photographies/21410.jpg




Публикацията е редактирана (24-01-05 23:50)

Отговори на това съобщение
 Re: connections (бръщолевеници)
Автор: 4i4o-Joro   
Дата:   24-01-05 23:50

Студентка учи фотография и не е чувала за Ман Рей [smilie11]

Малиииии, светът се е побъркал . . .

Утешете ме, кажете че не вярно, че е майтап, излъжете ме [smilie11] [smilie11] [smilie11]

Отговори на това съобщение
 Re: connections (бръщолевеници)
Автор: joshua   
Дата:   24-01-05 23:53

futureal [smilie6] [smilie6] [smilie25] [smilie7]

Отговори на това съобщение
 Re: connections (бръщолевеници)
Автор: SanniE   
Дата:   24-01-05 23:58





Публикацията е редактирана (25-01-05 00:10)

Отговори на това съобщение
 Re: connections (бръщолевеници)
Автор: 4i4o-Joro   
Дата:   25-01-05 00:01

Помолих да ме излъжете . . [smilie11]

Отговори на това съобщение
 Re: connections (бръщолевеници)
Автор: joshua   
Дата:   25-01-05 00:01

ами щом имаш желание да знаеш, но те мързи да провериш, позволи ми, да ти направя тази услуга also known as

Отговори на това съобщение
 Re: connections (бръщолевеници)
Автор: joshua   
Дата:   25-01-05 00:36

дали и прЪВ???

https://photo-forum.net/static/forum/2006-01/gmjt8537.JPG
http://www.centrepompidou.fr/education/ressources/ENS-surrealisme/Images/ManRay-XL.jpg


ps
е



Публикацията е редактирана (25-01-05 00:43)

Отговори на това съобщение
 Re: connections (бръщолевеници)
Автор: stoevmobile   
Дата:   25-01-05 07:49

Пак ли изпуснах интересни постинги?[smilie11] [smilie11] [smilie11] [smilie3]

Отговори на това съобщение
 Re: connections (бръщолевеници)
Автор: joshua   
Дата:   26-01-05 00:07

spoko stoev, ne si izturval Emmanuel Radinski

b&w
http://www.articons.co.uk/images/manray/1.jpg


http://www.articons.co.uk/images/manray/1.jpg
http://www.icp.org/exhibitions/man_ray/images/man_ray_book_large.jpg



the educated fool
...
Time will flow
And I will follow
Time will go
But I will follow
...

ili puk William of Оckham

hmmm, neshto mi se poolabiha vruzkite mai [smilie5]

ps

Occam's Razor

one should not increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required to explain anything

sya she go potursya na latinski che syakash zvucheshe dosta lubopitno



Публикацията е редактирана (26-01-05 00:16)

Отговори на това съобщение
 Re: connections (бръщолевеници)
Автор: joshua   
Дата:   26-01-05 00:21

Occam's (or Ockham's) razor is a principle attributed to the 14th century logician and Franciscan friar; William of Occam. Ockham was the village in the English county of Surrey where he was born.

The principle states that "Entities should not be multiplied unnecessarily." Sometimes it is quoted in one of its original Latin forms to give it an air of authenticity.

"Pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate"
"Frustra fit per plura quod potest fieri per pauciora"
"Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem"

In fact, only the first two of these forms appear in his surviving works and the third was written by a later scholar. William used the principle to justify many conclusions including the statement that "God's existence cannot be deduced by reason alone." That one didn't make him very popular with the Pope.

Many scientists have adopted or reinvented Occam's Razor as in Leibniz' "identity of observables" and Isaac Newton stated the rule: "We are to admit no more causes of natural things than such as are both true and sufficient to explain their appearances."

The most useful statement of the principle for scientists is,

"when you have two competing theories which make exactly the same predictions, the one that is simpler is the better."

ps

final word is of unknown origin, although it's often attributed to Einstein, himself a master of the quotable one liner:

"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler."



Публикацията е редактирана (26-01-05 00:25)

Отговори на това съобщение
 Re: connections (бръщолевеници)
Автор: joshua   
Дата:   26-01-05 00:50

te tva sa divo imaginerni ponyatiya kato cvetovete na proPhoto, ma who cares? i komu li sa nuzhni???

Отговори на това съобщение
 Re: connections (бръщолевеници)
Автор: joshua   
Дата:   26-01-05 01:38

fogas, vizh tova e za stranger-a veche:

Intuitive and Abstractive Cognition

One of the more intriguing features of late medieval epistemology in general, and of Ockham's view in particular, is the development of a theory known as “intuitive and abstractive cognition.” The theory is found in authors as diverse as Duns Scotus, Peter Auriol, Walter Chatton, and Ockham. But their theories of intuitive and abstractive cognition are so different that it is hard to see any one thing they are all supposed to be theories of. Nevertheless, to a first approximation, intuitive cognition can be thought of as perception, whereas abstractive cognition is closer to imagination or remembering. The fit is not exact, however, since authors who had a theory of intuitive and abstractive cognition usually also allowed the distinction at the intellectual level as well.

It is important to note that abstractive cognition, in the sense of this theory, has nothing necessarily to do with “abstraction” in the sense of producing universal concepts from cognitive encounters with individuals. Instead, what abstractive cognition “abstracts” from is the question of the existence or non-existence of the object. By contrast, intuitive cognition is very much tied up with the existence or non-existence of the object. Here is how Ockham distinguishes them:[41]

For intuitive cognition of a thing is a cognition such that by virtue of it it can be known whether the thing exists or not, in such a way that if the thing does exist, the intellect at once judges it to exist and evidently knows it to exist … Likewise, intuitive cognition is such that when some things are known, one of which inheres in the other or the one is distant in place from the other or is related in another way to the other, it is at once known by virtue of the incomplex cognitions of those things whether the thing inheres or does not inhere, whether it is distant or not distant, and so on for other contingent truths …
Abstractive cognition, however, is that by virtue of which it cannot be evidently known of the thing whether it exists or does not exist. And in this way abstractive cognition, as opposed to intuitive cognition, “abstracts” from existence and non-existence, because by it neither can it be evidently known of an existing thing that it exists, nor of a non-existent one that it does not exist.

The correct interpretation of Ockham's theory of intuitive and abstractive cognition is a matter of considerable controversy. The “standard” view holds that intuitive cognition for Ockham grounds infallible judgments, whereas abstractive cognition does not. Recently, however, this view has been questioned on the grounds that it is based on a misreading of a certain text. The issues are complex and subtle, and the matter has not yet been finally sorted out.[42]


http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ockham/#6.2

Отговори на това съобщение
 Re: connections (бръщолевеници)
Автор: stranger   
Дата:   26-01-05 19:31

1. PHILOSOPHY being nothing else but the study of Wisdom and Truth, it may with reason be expected that those who have spent most time and pains in it should enjoy a greater calm and serenity of mind, a greater clearness and evidence of knowledge, and be less disturbed with doubts and difficulties than other men. Yet, so it is, we see the illiterate bulk of mankind, that walk the highroad of plain common sense, and are governed by the dictates of nature, for the most part easy and undisturbed. To them nothing that is familiar appears unaccountable or difficult to comprehend. They complain not of any want of evidence in their senses, and are out of all danger of becoming Sceptics. But no sooner do we depart from sense and instinct to follow the light of a superior principle — to reason, meditate, and reflect on the nature of things, but a thousand scruples spring up in our minds, concerning those things which before we seemed fully to comprehend. Prejudices and errors of sense do from all parts discover themselves to our view; and, endeavouring to correct these by reason, we are insensibly drawn into uncouth paradoxes, difficulties, and inconsistencies, which multiply and grow upon us as we advance in speculation; till at length, having wandered through many intricate mazes, we find ourselves just where we were, or, which is worse, sit down in a forlorn Scepticism.


2. The cause of this is thought to be the obscurity of things, or the natural weakness and imperfection of our understandings. It is said the faculties we have are few, and those designed by nature for the support and comfort of life, and not to penetrate into the inward essence and constitution of things: besides, the mind of man being finite, when it treats of things which partake of Infinity, it is not to be wondered at if it run into absurdities and contradictions, out of which it is impossible it should ever extricate itself; it being of the nature of the Infinite not to be comprehended by that which is finite.


3. But, perhaps, we may be too partial to ourselves in placing the fault originally in our faculties, and not rather in the wrong use we make of them. It is a hard thing to suppose that right deductions from true principles should ever end in consequences which cannot be maintained or made consistent. We should believe that God has dealt more bountifully with the sons of men than to give them a strong desire for that knowledge which he had placed quite out of their reach. This were not agreeable to the wonted indulgent methods of Providence, which, whatever appetites it may have implanted in the creatures, doth usually furnish them with such means as, if rightly made use of, will not fail to satisfy them. Upon the whole, I am inclined to think that the far greater part, if not all, of those difficulties which have hitherto amused philosophers, and blocked up the way to knowledge, are entirely owing to ourselves. We have first raised a dust, and then complain we cannot see.


George Berkeley,
The Principles of Human Knowledge



Публикацията е редактирана (26-01-05 19:46)

Отговори на това съобщение
 първа  назад  1  2  3     всички  напред  последна
Всички теми
Дървовиден изглед
Нагоре