Автор: uri64
Дата: 29-12-10 17:29
Ммммм не мога да се сдържа просто да не ви насоча вниманието към последното извержение на чичко Кен за това как и Никон Д700, че и Айпод Тъч са в пъти по-добри от М9
Фърляйте ги тея М9ки и тва е..аз добре че първо си взех Айфон 4 преди М9ката сега просто ще я пропусна
ЦИТАТ:
The funny news is just how sloppy are the electronics and firmware of the cottage-industry LEICA M9, compared to the mature products sold by Nikon and Canon. Nikon and Canon have huge in-house design budgets, while little Leica contracts much of it out.
The M9, even though it has no autofocus, no flipping reflex mirror and not much of anything compared to a DSLR, the M9 only goes a few hundred shots on a charge, not thousands like the Nikon D7000.
Not only is the M9's battery life short, but much worse, the battery meter isn't always accurate.
This morning the M9 battery meter read 25%, and a few shots later with no warning, it was dead.
Do you have any idea how stupid it makes one feel to have a dead camera around one's neck? An M9 with a dead battery is totally useless, and when it gives no notice and suddenly leaves you dead in the middle of a shot, you feel like an idiot. Worse, it didn't even have the decency to record the last shot I made to my card!
Oh well, I always pack a spare, in this case, my iPod Touch, whose camera works just fine, and whose auto white balance works about as well as the LEICA M9's.
I wouldn't ditch a D700 for a D7000; I'd hang onto it and wait for whatever comes next in FX, but if you're in a hurry, yes, I prefer both the ergonomics and the final images I'm getting out of my D7000.
|
|