Автор: boreto
Дата: 20-01-09 08:47
Заключенията от горецитираното ревю:
Image quality: outdoors / daylight
If you mainly shoot outdoors in good light any of the cameras here will do the job, with little to choose between the better cameras here unless you intend to print at sizes larger than about 8x10 inches. The worst in the group is the Samsung, but even then you'll only see the lack of crisp detail at larger print sizes. Overall ranking takes into account not only sharpness but color, metering, white balance, focus and contrast. I must stress that for this particular test the differences are pretty small:
* Best of the bunch: Canon PowerShot SD 880 IS, Fujifilm F100fd
* Middle of the road: Sony W300, Panasonic FX150, Nikon Coolpix S710
* Bottom of the class: Samsung TL34HD (NV100HD)
Image quality: Low light / High ISO
Shooting at anything over base ISO, and particularly when you start to get to the higher reaches of the ISO range, produces far more variation in the performance of the different models, with some clear winners and some obvious losers. Although the gap is nowhere like as large as it was in the days of the F30/F31fd, the Fujifilm still leads the pack here, with the Samsung and Nikon the least impressive.
* Best of the bunch: Fujifilm F100fd, Canon PowerShot SD 880 IS
* Middle of the road: Sony W300, Panasonic FX150,
* Bottom of the class: Samsung TL34HD (NV100HD), Nikon Coolpix S710
Image quality / performance: Flash
All six cameras produce perfectly good flash output and in truth, for the typical user, there's little practical difference between them. The rankings below represent the sliver of difference between the best and worst based on flash exposure, low light focus, recycle time, red eye removal and exposure.
* Best of the bunch: Fujifilm F100fd, Canon PowerShot SD 880 IS
* Middle of the road: Sony W300, Panasonic FX150,
* Bottom of the class: Samsung TL34HD (NV100HD), Nikon Coolpix S710
|
|