Автор: Digitalgab
Дата: 01-04-14 09:44
Чети по добре, също и редовете в края на статията. Като си дал парите си, не търси оправдания.
Just to make this clear: I've done a lot more tests than shown above. Even with very good prime lenses instead of the zoom lenses. The results always have the same tendency.
And those who don't believe me can find a similar comparison with many more cameras in the well-recognized German photo magazine ColorFoto (issue 3/2013, pp. 30). The results are nonambiguous: No substantial resolution advantages for cameras without aliasing filters.
P.s.: Many people confuse (perceived) sharpness with resolution (or detail). More on this can be found here. In short, a picture with high resolution (lots of details) may give an unsharp impression and a picture with much lower resolution may be perceived sharper. Resolution (detail) happens only at the time when the image is taken, sharpness can be increased in photoshop (with some restrictions) ...
Вярно че е за друга тема. Но тенденцията към поевтиняване на производството се забелязва - първо махнаха CCD сензорите, защото оскъпяват, после АА филтрите, щото пак оскъпяват, но важното за фирмите е да ни убедят че го правят за да ни дадат повече качество, а не за да ни вземат повече пари.
Публикацията е редактирана (01-04-14 09:56)
|
|