Автор: hotsnail
Дата: 10-03-14 21:14
Thom Hogan за А7 и А7r
But on the other hand, for casual shooting I enjoyed the A7 more than I do my D610 ;~). So I keep coming back to that. Indeed, I eventually concluded that the A7 with the 35mm f/2.8 lens is essentially as good in image quality as the RX1, and way more convenient (built-in EVF) and flexible, which is why I sold my RX1. Thus, I’m amused: Sony is competing with themselves just as much, if not more so, than they are with Canon and Nikon.
If you’re a JPEG shooter, you can consider either camera, but I don’t know why you’d need 36mp other than for bragging rights. I’d say a JPEG shooter who also shoots some raw and is willing to deal with the compression issues in the raw format should take a long, hard look at the A7. I’m going to recommend it. It’s a competent camera with enough performance in focus and frame rate to handle some motion shots when necessary, and it’s a strong value at its price.
However, you have to make a decision about whether Sony will produce the lenses you eventually want and need. I think so, though I suspect that telephoto options will be minimal. For a convenient travel camera, the A7 has enough of everything you’d want to make it a contender, though, thus my recommendation.
The A7r, however, I’m not going to recommend. If we’re going to push up the sensor specs that far, that needs to be supported by better integrity in raw files and more attention to keeping the potential quality at the highest level (e.g. avoiding shutter shock).
Остава и Кен да ги погледне...ама вече е ясна работата ако искаш най-кефещата играчка - А7
Иначе от това ревю е ясно, че задължително трябва да оправят с фърмуер, някой проблеми ..сигурно и тука съм ги писал преди, ама още веднъж не боли
+ add uncompressed RAW
+ add minimum shutter speed in auto iso
+ fix start up time
+ fix image review (sometimes camera refuses to magnify images)
+ video quality (pixel binning, encoding etc..)
Публикацията е редактирана (10-03-14 21:19)
|
|