Автор: compur
Дата: 28-01-13 12:24
малко инфо от друг форум:
"pohutukawa2008 that is correct, but if you edit in 8 bit TIFF, you've lost 4-6 bits of information. This information controls your dynamic range and if you convert to a 8bit TIFF you lose some of your headroom that you would have when you send it to an output lab. Now keeping that in perspective, ProPhotoRGB for higher end labs have a gamut that's not much larger than 8bit, but ProPhotoRGB preserves colours in the ranges that matter more to photographers (highlight colours like yellow and light reds).
If you edit in NX Capture you'll be fine as what it is doing is it performs its own 12-14bit non destructive edits. When you export it to 8bit TIFF, it will get rid of unnecessary colours depending on what colour profile you choose. If you choose 16bit TIFF, you'll preserve maximum colour information which from an archival point of view is better.
If you're selling your artwork to creative agencies, most of them will ask for TIFFs. When giving CD's to clients, you should use 8bit JPGs and for the NEF RAW files, you should be only keeping those to yourself."
и едно линкче (звучна българска дума ;)) към една статийка, дето им разказва играта на битовете тук
|
|