Автор: Ivan_A
Дата: 15-10-08 07:10
Е3 е със старата, но "по-добра", поне на хартия, по данни на производителя - " Обхват на ефективна компенсация - до 5 EV стъпки "
Е520 е с по-нова - действа и при вертикално кадриране, но с по-ниска ефективност: " Обхват на ефективна компенсация - до 4 EV стъпки" - от тук е:
http://www.olympus.bg/consumer/dslr_digital_slr_specifications_e-520_19289.htm
От моя опит с Е3, 5 стъпки съм постигал много рядко, само с дългофокусни обективи.
Това е по-реалистична преценка:
"... When testing the E-510, I have developed a procedure to determine this difference. The procedure is, I believe, sound and solid, even if based on subjective evaluation: it does a statistical evaluation of a large number of comparative samples, shot at various shutter speeds. With the method in place, it was not a problem to run such a test for the E-3. Here are the basic results:
* At F=12 mm: the benefit is about 1 EV (exposures longer by 2×)
* At F=60 mm: 1.5 eV (or 2.8×)
* At F=150 mm: 2.4 EV (5.2×).
The full data can be found in a separate article on this subject. The bottom line is: while there is no doubt that image stabilization in the E-3 is working, its effects are far from those claimed by Olympus.
Is this a disappointment? In one sense yes, as always when a claim does not match reality. In another — no: this does not mean that the E-3 is doing worse than competing models, as I have serious doubts on the validity os similar claims being made for those. "
От тук е:
http://www.wrotniak.net/photo/43/e3-rev.htmlIS
И без стабилизация, Е3 е отлична камера.![[smilie24]](https://photo-forum.net/forum/smileys/smiley24.gif)
|
|