Автор: lexi
Дата: 12-09-06 18:39
Хрумна ми да си взема Иксус.След дълго четене на тестове се спрях на Иксус 55(1/2,5 матрица;
5 мегапиксела;от50 до 400 АСА) и Иксус 60(1/2,5 матрица;6 мегапиксела;от 80до 800 АСА)След всичко изчетено стигнах до извода че Иксус 60 прави по-безшумни снимки на 400 АСА въпреки повечето пиксели на една и съшта матрица.Дори и 800АСА са използваеми при 10х15.Нещо не разбирам,бъркам или що ли?
With the Canon SD600, we found that it had enough resolution to make very crisp 8x10 inch prints. At 11x14, its prints were a bit softer, but more than adequate for wall or table display. At very high ISO, image noise levels are decent, but color is subdued. ISO 400 images are still usable at 11x14, but don't get excellent until 8x10. ISO 800 are marginal even at 5x7 inches, but look pretty good at 4x6, which is what most folks print anyway. Color-wise, the SD600's images looked great when printed on the iP5200, with good color. The exception is skin tones, which looked ruddy. Other colors made it through impressively well.
The Canon SD450 had enough resolution to make very crisp 8x10 inch prints. At 11x14, its prints were a bit softer looking, but more than adequate for wall or table display. At high ISO, image noise increased somewhat, and the images softened as the camera tried to suppress the image noise. The SD450 managed the trade-off between noise and sharpness pretty well though. When printed, ISO 200 shots look a little soft but quite acceptable at 8x10 inches, and are very good at 5x7. ISO 400 images are a little noisy but probably acceptable for most people at 5x7 inches, and look good at 4x6.
http://www.imaging-resource.com
Леле стана супер дълго.
|
|